A supermarket compares life-cycle assessments (LCAs) for a paper bag and a plastic (poly(ethene)) bag.
| Paper bag | Plastic bag | |
|---|---|---|
| Raw material | wood | crude oil |
| Energy to make one bag in MJ | 1.7 | 0.6 |
| Mass of CO2 released making one bag in g | 110 | 40 |
| Disposal | biodegradable; recycled easily | not biodegradable; can be reused many times |
Evaluate the use of paper bags compared with plastic bags. Use the data in the table. [4]
- any three from: (paper bag) made from a renewable resource (wood) whereas crude oil is finite / non-renewable; paper bag needs more energy to make (1.7 MJ vs 0.6 MJ / about 3 times as much); paper bag releases more CO2 when made (110 g vs 40 g / about 3 times as much), so contributes more to global warming / climate change; paper bag is biodegradable / easily recycled whereas plastic bag is not biodegradable / persists in landfill / litter; plastic bag can be reused many times (so its impact per use is lower) — first point(1)
- second point from the list above(1)
- third point from the list above; at least one of the three points must quote or compare figures from the table, otherwise max 2 of these 3 marks(1)
- a justified overall judgement (either bag may be preferred) consistent with the points made, e.g. plastic bags have lower production impact, especially if reused many times; or paper bags are better because they come from a renewable resource and are biodegradable despite higher energy use and CO2; an unsupported conclusion does not score(1)
- Answer: Paper: renewable and biodegradable but nearly 3× the energy and CO2 per bag; plastic: finite raw material, persists in environment, but lower production impact and reusable — a justified conclusion is needed.
- Examiner tip: 'Evaluate' needs a judgement at the end — listing points without a conclusion caps you at 3 marks.